Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on VJO

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Foot & Ankle Specialist
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voronov, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Patwardhan, A. G.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Voronov, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Patwardhan, A. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Static Measure of Foot Loading

Michael L. Voronov, Michael S. Pinzur, MD*, Heather H. Hoffman, MD, Robert M. Havey, Gerard Carandang, and Avinash G. Patwardhan, PhD

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mpinzu1{at}lumc.edu.


   Abstract
Static and dynamic loading of the foot are important characteristics for understanding human walking in both health and disease. The goal of this investigation was to determine whether an objective measure of normal midstance loading of the foot could reliably be recorded using readily available disposable qualitative recording devices. Ten randomly selected normal volunteers were trained to step on Harris mat and Pressure Stat recording devices during normal walking. Each of the recordings was divided into 5 weight-bearing regions by 2 separate examiners. After outlining each foot, the recordings were digitized and compared. Interobserver reliability ranged from 0.81 to 0.96 for the Harris mat technique and 0.94 to 0.97 for the Pressure Stat technique. Data from a linear regression plot indicate high precision of calculations of the foot masks between the 2 examiners based on an R2 value of 0.966 using the Pressure Stat method. These data plus a linear regression plot suggest that both qualitative recording devices, when digitized using a standardized format, appear to obtain a reliable objective measure of midstance loading during normal gait. The Pressure Stat device may be slightly more reliable. It is planned to use this standardized experimental model to compare objectively patterns of midstance loading in patients with injury or disease that is capable of altering normal walking.

First published on October 6, 2009
Foot & Ankle Specialist 2009, doi:10.1177/1938640009349451


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?